One-sided defeat, how did the Clippers lose? Tyron Luqi s move was a move, and he changed his team to swallow the bitter fruit.
6:52pm, 10 May 2025Basketball
The 7th game between the Clippers and the Nuggets did not play until the last moment as everyone imagined, showing a one-sided trend. In fact, in the tiebreak game, such games can often be seen. For the Clippers, this game was awful and losing was expected, so they ended the season. In an ugly defeat, how did the Clippers lose? Tyron Luqi's move was a move and turned into a formation to swallow the bitter fruit.
From the perspective of the Clippers, this is an ugly big defeat. Why do you say so? On the one hand, the Clippers were passive in the game and did not make any good adjustments, but instead became even more timid. On the other hand, when the Clippers were most behind, they could be said to have reached 35 points and eventually lost 19 points. It was originally a match that was evenly matched, but it turned out to be what it is now. It really made people unexpectedly, so they naturally couldn't win.
So how did the Clippers lose? First, change the formation and swallow the bitter fruit. In this game, Tyron Lu chose to change the formation, but we all saw it, swallowing bitter fruit for the transformation. Tyron Lu's change of formation means that the game has entered a shorter rotation, which also disrupted the original game rhythm. I really don't know what Tyron Lu thought. For the Clippers, there is no room for trial and error in the tiebreak, but Tyron Lue did just that, so he naturally had to accept the result of losing.
Second, Tyron Lu's chess was one move. In this game, Tyron Lu was at a disadvantage in the fight with the Nuggets coach. When the Nuggets are lagging behind, they can make timely adjustments. On the other hand, there is no change on Tyron Lue. The Nuggets' offensive end led to multiple blooms with a single point, and the game played quite smoothly. The Clippers have unlimited singles, but the singles efficiency is not high. Sometimes it is like this, not only the player's condition, but also the coach's coaching ability.
Third, Harden performed poorly. Competitions like this often require core performance. Leonard actually worked very hard during his time playing, scoring 22 points and 5 rebounds. However, Harden's side, this game fell into the vicious circle of Tianwang Mountain again, and hesitated on the offensive end and defended with eyes and eyes on the defensive end. When Harden can't play the data, it will naturally be difficult for the Clippers. I can only say that Harden is unlikely to perform in every game now.
Fourth, my mentality collapsed when I was behind. Once a game like tiebreak is behind, it will test the players' mentality. When the Clippers were lagging behind, their mentality could be said to have collapsed. When the mentality breaks down, it is destined to be a one-sided game. There is no way to do this. The Clippers are already at the end of their strength and can no longer raise their energy. So, it is not unreasonable to win the Tianwangshan game and win the series.
Related Posts
- 109-111 defeat! Tianwang Mountain is under the fall, who is the culprit? Data will not lie!
- Since the performance is not bad, why can t the Pacers give more mobile phones to the backcourt star?
- Reed to the Timberwolves 0-2, 0 of 12 three-pointers exposed the team s offensive difficulties
- Yang Hansen returns to Los Angeles after joint trial in Chicago
- James latest interview content was exposed, saying that he would not play in G6 even if he wins G5
- Which team in the NBA is the most valuable top three faults? One team soars by 40%, and the market value of the top ten billion
- If the Heat chases Durant but fails, it will change its goal. Morant Dero agrees with the core of Plan B
- Three-pointers + free throws all-around! The Rockets 3-controlled control meets the requirements of Uduka. It only takes 5 million to keep him on the team.
- The Clippers try out a forward super scorer who might become a contender for a two-way contract?