G6 must-see! These 10 numbers reveal the secret of the life and death game in the finals! Yincheng is in a hurry!

In the city is going to tie the seventh game today, the Thunder leads 3-2, and the Pacers must win. Don't want to be fooled? Remember the following 10 data first, and then watch the game and you will understand it all.

1. The number of passes differed by 598 times

Pacers passed the ball in one pass: in 5 games, they passed 598 more than the Thunder, an average of 120 more times in one game.

To put it bluntly, they just want to use team attacks to break down your defense line - but only 21% of the Thunder's two major scorers, Alexander + Jewish, made only 21% of the shots were assisted by teammates, and they were more about creating opportunities by themselves.

2. 31 more opportunities

Do you think the efficiency of shooting is important? Yes, but more opportunities are more critical. The Thunder have 31 more shots or free throws than the Pacers in these 5 games.

The Pacers shoot accurately enough (the real shooting rate is 58.3%), but if they shoot more, make more fouls, and grab more frontcourt boards, they will win by the large amount.

3. Half season + steals: 229 steals in the Thunder playoffs, 229 steals in total (52 seasons) since the statistics were refreshed, 23 more steals than the second place!

In Game 5 alone, they forced the Pacers to make 23 mistakes and scored 32 points with their opponent's "gift".

4. 110.1 points/100 rounds

Excluding the two major players' absences in the last game, the Pacers only scored 110.1 points/100 rounds in five games - their worst output since the main season.

The hit rate is OK, but the turnover rate is soaring. Once the half-time tug-of-war is not defeated, the opponent will be defensive.

5. +14 points win watershed

The Thunder averaged 14 points/100 rounds per game; the two lost games were only about 6 points more. What is the difference between

? When they win, they fouled and got more free throws (40.6 vs 30.5), and they also grabbed even harder rebounds (36.4% vs 28.3%).

6. The penalty area + free throw total net victory 65 points

The Thunder won 34 points in the penalty area and scored 31 more points in the free throw, totaling **+65 points**!

Pacers instead scored 41 points on the outside (outside the penalty area), but this defensive loophole is too big.

7. Halliburton is not present, lose 14.5 points

Once your backbone is out, the man will immediately lose 14.5 points/100 rounds - this is the embarrassment of the Pacers' substitute.

In the fifth game, he was injured and was suppressed by the Thunder.

8. The corner three-pointer 49.1%

Pacers' corner three-point shooting percentage is close to 50% (49.1%), which is higher than the Thunder, but they can't stay away from the corner kick.

They only had 31.3% of their three-pointers in the arc in this round, which was the worst in the entire playoff series.

9. The three-point shooting percentage in the last 6 seconds was 17.4%

and the three-pointer was started until 6 seconds left? The two teams made only 12 (17.4%) with a total of 69 shots.

The Thunder were better, the Pacers were so bad that they only scored 15.4 points to convert (the first three games were 25.8 points), and even the shooting percentage dropped to a pitiful 25.5%.

10. Halliburton's pick-and-roll was replaced, and the Pacers only scored 0.63 points

When the Thunder decided to switch Halliburton's pick-and-roll directly, the Pacers only had 0.63 points (24 goals and 38 points).

If they were replaced by other defense methods, they could get 0.92 points, and the isolation singles were only 0.45 points per time - they were dragged to the point of fighting hard, and they suffered a loss.

The 10 numbers tell you:

The Pacers want to fight the team? Thunder won't let it go!

Want to use rhythm to push people? Thunder is faster!

Want to fight back with rebounds? Thunder fights without ambiguity!

Once the main force is injured, the rotation will be exposed.

Whether G6 can be revived tonight depends on whether Halliburton can get it, whether McConnell can burst out energy, and whether the Thunder can continue to play these details. Don’t just look at the scores. Focusing on these data is the winner’s thinking!