US media commented on the strongest lineup of the 21st century: Letters 3rd formation, Jokic 2nd formation, 4 top ten in history

The NBA All-Series this season has caused dissatisfaction among many fans. Some fans believe that James and Curry are not worthy of the Best Second Team. Shin Kyung, the core of the West, was not selected for the Best Second Team, which has caused a lot of controversy. There will be doubts about the Best Line selection almost every year, but will there be controversy if the Best Line in the 21st century be evaluated? Previously, the US media ranked the strongest lineup from the 21st century to the present. Let’s take a look at it? The three formations are Paul, Harden, Antetokounmpo, Nothing and Howard respectively. Paul is one of the greatest players without a championship in history. Paul is the second in the assist and steal list in history, second only to Stockton. At the same time, Paul is also one of the point guards with the most best defense teams in history, with a total of 9 times. The reason why Paul still has a very high recognition without MVP and championship is that he is one of the most versatile point guards in history, able to score, assist and defend.

Harden also did not receive enough recognition because he did not have a championship. Harden was one of the best singles players in history at his peak. His three-pointer and foul skills affected the playing style of many players. He also made contributions to the deepening of the small ball era. He won the MVP and three scoring champions in his career. Antetokounmpo is one of the best players in history to have offense and defense. He has won MVP and DPOY in a single season, and his talent is very similar to James when he was young.

North King is only in this category, and it is estimated that many fans are already very interested in the first two categories. After all, Niuth King has led the team to win the championship with a single core, and he is one of the most influential players in foreign countries. If it weren't for him, there wouldn't be so many European players who dared to enter the NBA to prove himself. He is the sixth in his career scoring history. Although Howard did not work hard enough, he did not reach the expected height, but after all, he had won DPOY and led the team to the finals, and his talent was very good. The second teams of

are Nash, Wade, Durant, Garnett and Jokic. Although Nash is not as good as Paul in his career data accumulation, he has won two MVPs after all, and has more great honors. He is Curry in the traditional basketball era, with attack and passes, and three-pointers are particularly accurate. Wade is considered the third point guard in history and scored the first ever efficiency value in the finals in 2006. Although he has no MVP, he has won FMVP and three championships.

Durant is one of the best scorers in history. Although Durant is bad in terms of honor and the image in the hearts of fans, it is undeniable that his scoring ability is indeed very strong. He has won four scoring champions in his career and has also averaged 30+ three shots per game in the finals. At his peak, Durant, I think his scoring ability is comparable to Jordan. Durant has two FMVP trophys.

Garnett was able to beat King No. 1 into the second team. To be honest, many fans were not satisfied with this result. Garnett is one of the most comprehensive power forwards in history. His scoring ability is indeed not as good as King No. 1, but his influence is not bad at all. He was trained by the league as a future facade and was selected for the first defense nine times, with the most power forwards in history. I believe everyone is familiar with Jokic. He is still at his peak at the most all-round center in history. I wonder if he can be ranked first center in the 21st century when he retires? The best teams of the 21st century are: Curry, Kobe, James, Duncan and O'Neal. Except for Curry, the other four of these five are recognized as the top ten in history. Curry is now in the top fifteen levels in history. When he retires, he may also enter the top ten discussions in history. After all, Curry is an epoch-making player, creating the era of small balls, and is also the number one scorer in history. He changed the sport of basketball and promoted the development of basketball.

Kobe was the most influential player in the 2000s. It can be said that he supported Jordan's first era after his retirement. Kobe is called the closest player to Jordan in history. This is not to boast about him, and he is indeed very similar to Jordan, with a strong desire to win. As the most successful player in the 21st century, James is the leader in total score in history, the only player in history with 40,000 + 10,000 + 10,000, and is also the player with the longest peak time in history.

Duncan is the No. 1 power forward in history. He has led the team to win the championship with a single core, and has also led the team to the playoffs for 19 consecutive years. He won 6 games and 5 wins in his career finals. If Duncan hadn't catered to the media, he would have received more recognition and was one of the best inside players in history with offense and defense. O'Neal is the most dominant big center in history. His dominance at his peak is probably comparable to Jordan and James in history. After all, he has achieved the existence of FMVP for three consecutive times, and he is the only two in history.

Kidd, Yao Ming and Westbrook's failure to enter this list may arouse doubts from many fans. Speaking of this, do you think the best lineup is reasonable? Welcome to leave a message for discussion.