Arenas dissatisfied with the comments that Adu helped Curry win two championships

Stephen Curry has recently been criticized by a large number of fans and media on the list of top 100 players in the US media. Stephen Curry, who believes that there are only 4 championships and one finals MVP, is not eligible to enter the top 10 in history. Because Kobe has five championships and two finals MVPs, Klay Thompson and O'Neal both believe that Kobe should be the top 10 players in history.

Apparently, Stephen Curry is the most overrated player and he should be kicked out of the top 10. Recently, Arenas, who participated in the voting for the top 100 players, explained why Kobe was not qualified to enter the top 10, that is, when he first won three consecutive championships, he partnered with O'Neal. He did not receive any honors or achievements. That three consecutive championships did not have much effect on Kobe's historical status improvement.

Soon, many fans and media responded to Arenas' remarks. It is believed that Stephen Curry's first three championships are also worthless and have little effect on his historical status. Because Stephen Curry didn't win the MVP in the Finals three times, and even when Kevin Durant won two consecutive MVPs, Stephen Curry didn't have enough strength to catch it.

Soon, Arenas also heard his own comments outside and questioned Stephen Curry's ranking. So, he talked about Stephen Curry on the show and made some comparisons with Garnett and Pierce.

Alinas said: "Garnett and Pierce, because they are not in the discussions of the top 5 and top 10 history, no one cares about their rings. If you put them into an elite group, then the fans and the media will start to say how they entered."

"When Curry retired, people wanted to push him to the top 10 of history. Now people criticize Durant and leave the Warriors, and they will treat Curry like this at that time. Curry has 4 rings, what will they say? Durant won 2 for you, and you only have 1 finals MVP."

The media's doubts, there is no problem. Stephen Curry is known as one of the best players in history. He won the championship in 2015 and scored the first record of 73 wins and 9 losses in 2016. As a result, he was eliminated by a major reversal while leading 3-1 in the playoffs.

Originally, I lost the 2016 finals and made a comeback next season, so I can just take revenge. As a result, he accepted Kevin Durant's arrival, an important factor in his career status that could not be much improved or entered the top 10 in history.

Looking at the best players in history, Michael Jordan, Kobe and others, how many of them would choose to cooperate with them at their peak? This is a manifestation of being regarded as a weak person. Stephen Curry believes that he does not have the ability to make a comeback. He needs better stars to help him defeat LeBron James.

So, it was Kevin Durant who defeated LeBron James in the 2017 and 2018 finals, not Stephen Curry. It was Kevin Durant who helped Stephen Curry and the Golden State Warriors to avenge the revenge of Kevin Durant, and it was Stephen Curry who accepted Kevin Durant's joining, which gave him two more NBA championships with low value. It is shameful that Stephen Curry became the second or third person for the Golden State Warriors during those three seasons, and at his peak. Even though LeBron James is already 40 years old in the 2024-25 season, he is still the number one player in the team. Since his career reached its peak, he has always been the boss of the team and has never played the role of the second in command of the team.

It is not that the fans and media are provoking trouble and deliberately belittle Stephen Curry, but that Stephen Curry himself did something that damages his historical status. If Kevin Durant was not recruited in the offseason in 2016 and he led the team back, his historical status would be recognized by many people, even higher than LeBron James. But as far as the current situation is concerned, it is indeed unworthy.