Without Halliburton s magical rescue, where did the Pacers come from the Eastern Conference and Finals?

Whether it is Harry's magic moment or the team's style of play, unless he has a bad game in the next few games, it would be like not giving him to Curry for 2015 years

{part from scoring and rebounding, Halliburton has led a lot of other major data, and there is also a winning shot. As for the others, I can't compete with them

Halliburton is similar to Billups,

Siakam is close to Roaring Heaven,

Turner corresponds to Big Ben,

Nemhard/Neismith is a bit like Prince

fmvp's real hard honor, because there are not many players who have played in the finals, and only one player with the best performance in the finals is a year

Originally missing a Hamilton, Mathering stood up, if you win the championship, the FMVP must be the No. 1 position of the big heart

Pacers shooter is really hard to guard against, with three-point shooting percentage of 40%! He is resilient and has a very accurate rhythm. The fourth-place finish in the league in the Eastern Conference, the Thunder played passively, and Carlisle made great contributions. The Finals' performance was so excellent.

This pedestrian should not be underestimated. Everyone is a soldier, and the substitutes are also powerful, and everyone can stand up! Carlisle made an indelible contribution

(Leng Knowledge: The person who brought the Pistons into the Eastern Conference Finals in 2003 and finished the championship team in the basic group was called Rick Carlisle)

It's really a civilian team that looks quite like the Pistons back then

The Thunder are a joke. The league wins first, and they are so good.